Perswijn in glijvlucht?

  • Jan

    Als wijnjunk ben ik op twee tijdschriften geabonneerd: Proefschrift en Perswijn. Proefschrift heb al lang geleden afgeschreven als serieus te nemen blad. Teveel het commerciële uithangbord van Jan van Lissum BV. Awards, goede recensies, jubelende proefnotities zijn allemaal tegen een passende vergoeding te verkrijgen.

    Dan Perswijn….

    De laatste Perswijn die op de mat viel had Nieuw Zeeland op de cover. “Ha, leuk!” dacht ik, want ik heb een zwak voor NZ wijnen. Wat volgde was een flinterdun verhaaltje (zowel qua omvang als inhoud) waarin het de schrijver (Sjoerd de Groot) gelukt is om alle relevante issues waar de NZ wijnindustrie momenteel mee te kampen heeft, niet te noemen (op zich een knappe prestatie). Deze issues zijn o.a. klimaatverandering, de extreem grote 2008 oogst (en hoe deze te slijten), hoe gaat hun premium image en prijzen zich verhouden nu NZ voor het eerst het aanbod, de vraag overstijgt enz. Het artikel wordt afgesloten met een proeverijtje van drie vrij obscure wijnproducenten die door één importeur ter beschikking zijn gesteld. Totaal niet representatief.

    Nee, dan Jancis Robinson. Recent schreef zij ook een artikel over de NZ wijnindustire (in haar wekelijkse FT column) en na het lezen van een artikel van haar hand ben je gelijk op de hoogte hoe het echt zit.

    Tweede voorbeeld komt uit het hoofdredactionele commentaar van Ronald de Groot. In een paar zinnen maakt hij gehakt van de Franse anti-alcohol wetgeving. Ronald schiet lekker uit z’n heup en giet er een sausje ‘Frankrijk-bashing’ overheen (doet het altijd goed in Nederland) en klaar is kees.

    Nee, ook nu weer heeft Jancis in eenn FT column hetzelfde onderwerp aangesneden. Jancis en Ronald komen tot dezelfde conclusie maar waar Ronald blijft steken in wat semantisch moddergooien komt Jancis met een zeer genuanceerd verhaal waarin alle kanten belicht worden. Wat een verschil.

    Toegeven, de mannen van Perswijn vergelijken met Jancis Robinson (vermoedelijk ’s werelds beste wijnjournaliste) is als FC Utrecht vergelijken met Manchester United.

    Maar FC Utrecht mag dan al een tijdje van FC Van Lissum winnen, toch moet het uitkijken dat het niet uit de Eredivisie degradeert.

    Ps: de twee artikelen van Jancis zal ik hieronder als reactie op dit draadje plaatsen.

  • Jan

    Marlborough at the crossroads

    21 Feb 2009 by Jancis Robinson/FT

    With any luck the 2009 vintage of the world’s most popular Sauvignon Blanc, to be picked in the next few weeks, should be the best ever.

    Earlier this month I revisited Marlborough, the New Zealand region responsible for this particularly pungent, fruity Sauvignon style, for the first time since 1995. Making a BBC television series then, we portrayed Marlborough’s quaintness by having me drive round in the Morris Minor owned by Cloudy Bay’s oenologist. At that stage the conversion of farmland to vineyard was sufficiently remarkable for us to draw parallels between Klondike and the region’s main town Blenheim - which had one, extremely basic, motel then, as I recall. Today’s grape growers drive around in massive 4x4s and the multitudes of wine tourists are spoilt for choice.

    Gold runs out, but the Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc lake has deepened rapidly and continuously since 1995 when Marlborough’s vineyard total was what seemed an already impressive 5,000 acres. Today it is almost 60,000 acres. As my plane from Christchurch dipped and dived over this windy expanse in the north of the South Island, I could hardly believe the extent to which it is now carpeted with green, thanks to the ubiquity of some of the largest, flattest, most uniform vineyards I have ever seen.

    It is hardly surprising that the wide Wairau Valley and the slightly cooler, more undulating Awatere Valley to the south have been so feverishly converted to the vine. International demand for Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc has, until now, seemed insatiable. One major factor in this has been the carefully managed cult status of the most famous example, Cloudy Bay Sauvignon Blanc. Now owned by LVMH and reputedly producing nearly two million bottles a year, Cloudy Bay Sauvignon is still sold as though it has to be rationed. Cloudy Bay even manages to command a premium over the average Marlborough Sauvignon, which, despite the fact that it requires no expensive oak ageing and, unlike so many other wines, is sold within months of the harvest, has managed to command much higher prices than most unoaked young whites.

    New Zealand wine, which largely means New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc, has enjoyed the highest average retail price in the UK, its most important market, for many years. At £6.47 a bottle, last year’s NZ average was a good £2.09 more than the next highest national average. The other factor that has helped sustain Marlborough Sauvignon’s price, apart from the huge popular appeal of its zesty, off-dry style, has been its relative scarcity. New Zealand is a minnow in terms of the volume of wine it produces and it was only relatively recently that the owners of the market leader (now Pernod Ricard) felt able to launch the leading brand of Marlborough Sauvignon in the US - where for obvious reasons it is not called Montana, as elsewhere, but Brancott Estate.

    With the 2008 vintage that is currently on the market all that changed. Last year’s was an embarrassingly large crop, the biggest ever at 154,000 tonnes, 69 per cent more than in the previous year, itself a record harvest. Yields in heavily irrigated Marlborough have traditionally been high. In 2008 some growers were rumoured to have produced as many as 10 tonnes of grapes per acre, two and a half times the maximum allowed in France’s Sauvignon Blanc stronghold Sancerre, for example. The grapes picked early in March 2008 were decent enough but then extreme heat followed by heavy rains meant that at the tail end of harvest there simply wasn’t enough tank space for grapes that were in any case, according to one visiting winemaker, ‘turning to mush on the vine’. Some growers sent their machines in to pick fruit straight on to the ground, to distance the rampant rot from the plants.

    With grapes surplus to demand for the first time, some of them barely recognisable as Sauvignon, those premium prices and brand supremacy have been much harder to sustain. Twice as much wine as usual was shipped out of New Zealand in bulk last year, especially to Australia, where New Zealand Sauvignon has ousted Australian Chardonnay as the country’s favourite white wine, but also to the UK where some of it ended up as a blend that Tesco supermarkets offered at £4.99 a bottle over Christmas. Aldi recently crowed about their Freemans Bay bottling at £5.99. Marlborough’s most opportunistic growers, long both derided and envied by other wine producers for their lucrative factory-farming model, have finally been made to realise that there is a limit to demand for what they can so easily produce.

    'We’re at a crossroads', the new man in charge of Wine Marlborough Marcus Pickens admitted during my recent visit, ‘but it’s good that people are now focused on quality’. Word is that this year growers are being schooled in the art of crop thinning by the big companies who buy grapes in Marlborough so that the 2009s should boast unusually concentrated flavours. According to John Stichbury, veteran producer of Jackson Estate Sauvignon Blanc, ‘2009 will be an absolute cracker in Marlborough – if we’re still in business’.

    One person who must be particularly worried by the current fall in price of Marlborough Sauvignon is Peter Yealands, a local farmer who made his first fortune in mussels and his second in the heavy machinery that has recently allowed him to re-landscape a mind-boggling 2,500 acres of the Awatere Valley and plant them with vines – mainly Sauvignon Blanc. The ill-fated 2008 was his first full-scale commercial vintage. He admits that his timing could have been better and describes the business of selling all this wine from so many extremely young vines as ‘a bit of a challenge. When we budgeted, bulk prices were $5-7 a litre, but now they’re closer to $2-4’. He is able to see a silver lining, however. ‘It’s put Savvy in markets it wasn’t in before – Germany for instance – but it will be a battle to get prices up again.’ His wine has made it into own-label bottlings by the likes of Sainsbury’s, Thresher, Marks & Spencer, the Co-op and The Wine Society, but it may be a struggle to establish Yealands as a premium brand at this stage.

    Yealands himself is obviously unusually resourceful, and his practical background has provided him with one or two novel solutions to the region’s viticultural challenges. Keen to reduce his agrochemical bill, he thought guinea pigs might provide an effective alternative to herbicides. A small-scale experiment proved him right, but also showed that to police the entire extent of his vineyards he would need 11 million of them. He is now busy breeding a flock of dwarf sheep, small enough to graze under the vines – and eventually to be sold off as Marlborough lamb. A hit in the making surely.

    MY CURRENT MARLBOROUGH FAVOURITES

    Astrolabe, Discovery Grovetown Riesling 2008

    Cloudy Bay Chardonnay 2007

    Dog Point Chardonnay 2007

    Framingham Wines Classic Riesling 2007

    Mahi, Francis Sauvignon Blanc 2007

    Seresin Reserve Sauvignon Blanc 2007

    Seresin, Home Vineyard Pinot Noir 2007

    Te Whare Ra Gewurztraminer 2008

    Wither Hills Chardonnay 2007

    Wither Hills Pinot Noir 2006

  • Jan

    Fraternité, égalité, sobriété

    14 Mar 2009 by Jancis Robinson/FT

    Largely unobserved by the rest of us, the world’s most important wine producing country has developed one of the most stringent anti-alcohol policies west of the Persian Gulf. Sarkozy is famously abstinent. Chirac sipped beer. It has been at least 14 years since the French wine industry had an ally in the Elysée Palace.

    Today, every advertisement for wine in the French press, whether it be for Château Lafite or Dom Pérignon champagne, has to carry the warning notice ‘L’abus d’alcohol est dangereux pour la santé, consommez avec modération’. (Alcohol misuse is dangerous for your health, consume moderately.)

    All wine bottled for sale in France now has to carry an image of a pregnant woman with a prohibitive line through it.

    Any form of alcohol-related sponsorship by even the smartest champagne company is banned. And it has been thought so likely that internet advertising of wine will also be forbidden that some of the most important sites such as Orange.fr have been refusing to take wine-related ads (although in the last few days it has been confirmed that such advertising will be allowed, so long as the sites are definitely not aimed at young people).

    As if to rub salt in the wound, the French government recently circulated a brochure to all of France’s doctors, based on the national cancer research institute’s report on alcohol and risk late last year, which recommends total abstinence from wine.

    Ten days ago French politicians voted on a healthcare bill that put a stop to the so-called ‘open bar’ (sic, in English) phenomenon whereby unlimited supplies of alcohol are offered, particularly to students who pay a small ticket price for the privilege of getting slammed at a brand owner’s expense. Wine producers were extremely concerned that one effect of this bill could be that they would no longer be allowed to pour tasting samples in their cellars and at trade fairs.

    In the end the health minister Roselyne Bachelot, whose own constituency is in the heart of Muscadet country, made a last-minute exception for professional wine tastings, but it is a reflection of the current anti-wine climate in France that the majority of vignerons genuinely thought it possible that there would be an outright ban on what for many of them is the only sales technique they know.

    It seems but a moment ago that France’s 600,000 vine growers were regarded as an important political force, to be feared by the government, and humoured by a succession of subsidies and grants. Today there is one small band of activists in the south of the country, CRAV, supposedly dedicated to the preservation of French viticulture by attacking such targets as present themselves to their remarkably short focus, most recently a winery outside Beziers owned by France’s largest bottler, deemed not to be paying growers enough. Other than that, it would seem that the French wine business has become supine, cowed and waiting for the next hammer blow to fall.

    Wine consumption in France is plummeting (particularly among the young people, whom Madame Bachelot particularly wishes to save from the demon drink). French wine exports are dire. Vineyards are being pulled up. And yet there does not seem to be an organised lobby standing up for the interests of the wine industry. According to Provence-based wine broker Charles Blagden, ‘no-one seems to have taken up the cudgels. There is more of a hue and cry about the new INAO laws.’ The INAO, the body that represents France’s better quality wines, is currently preoccupied with a major reorganisation of French wine nomenclature that is supposed to create wines that can compete more directly with New World wines.

    James Lawther, a Master of Wine and wine writer living near Bordeaux, believes that the French wine industry made a fatal mistake by not managing to distance itself from the more powerful beer and spirits lobbies. ‘Vignerons feel they have little support from the government, unlike the Spanish government, which draws a clear distinction between spirits and wine. They give aid to wine-related building projects. King Juan Carlos will open new bodegas. Wine is seen in quite a different light in Spain.’

    In France, one of the few voices to speak out against what he calls the ‘hygienists’ and their calamitous effect on the wine business is journalist Jacques Dupont of Le Point, but the vintners themselves seem almost resigned to their demonisation by France’s powerful health lobby.

    Just before the recent healthcare bill was voted on, Charles Sydney, a British-born wine broker based in the wine village of Chinon in the Loire valley, was in London showing his wares to the UK wine trade in the bowels of the Royal Society of Arts - as if in recognition of the artistic nature of French winemaking. I asked him what he thought of the proposed ban, and was quite surprised by his reaction. He first of all found a wall to lean against, then let out a long stream of breath through his ample beard .

    'I have growers come to dinner with us. I serve them a lot of wine. The wife doesn’t drink so that she can drive home. And then who takes the steering wheel? He does. The whole French wine culture needs to be re-examined at every level. We need to examine where wine is a cultural object. Some tasting rooms don’t even have spittoons, for example.'

    It is certainly easy to see what inspires France’s anti-alcohol campaign. The traditional French attitude to drinking and driving, for instance, leaves much to be desired, with alcohol implicated in 45% of all fatal car accidents, even though this is slowly changing since the long-overdue reform in policing drunk drivers. As Charles Sydney points out, ‘the French don’t seem to respond well to being asked to change their behaviour or their attitudes, but they do respond to being fined’.

  • Pierre

    Beste Jan,

    Ik ben het voor een groot deel met je eens!

    Wellicht dat elk land de (wijn)journalistiek krijgt die het verdient?

    Met andere woorden: zijn wij wel kritisch genoeg? Nemen wij niet te snel genoegen met middelmatigheid?

    Een en ander is ook toepasbaar op een aantal willekeurige andere takken van sport, zoals politiek, onderwijs, gezondheidszorg, banken, radio en tv, etc.

    Dank voor je pittig stuk!

  • Chris

    Pierre,

    Of het ook toepasbaar is op andere takken van sport betwijfel ik ten zeerste, zou niet graag ruilen met de banken ,politiek of onderwijs in Engeland, radio en t.v. ben ik niet zo op de hoogte..

    Ben het eens met het stukje van Jan.

    Gr.Chris,

  • Jasper

    Ik vind zelf dat Perswijn zich vaak volledig stort op het produkt wijn (op zich niet slecht voor een wijnblad), maar vrijwel geen aandacht besteed aan de wereld om het produkt heen waarin ik als wijnliefhebber veel meer interesse heb.

    Voorbeeld: het artikel “2008 in Bordeaux: Klassiek en koopwaardig” (dec. 2008). Het hele arikel gaat over de meeldauw, de bloei, get weer etc. De laatste 2 regels van het artikel zeggen iets over een mogelijke prijsdaling door de fincanciele crisis. Of Bordeaux nog koopwaardig is heeft wat mij betreft vrijwel niets te maken met theoretische beschouwingen over de kwaliteit van wijnen die nota bene nog gemaakt moeten worden. En veel meer met de marktsituatie van Bordeaux: hoe zit het met de voorraden van 2006 en 2007, de vraag vanuit Azië en Amerika en heeft en-primeur kopen nog wel zin? Helaas:daar lees ik niets over.

    En verder:

    Internet krijgt vrijwel geen aandacht. Terwijl ik juist wil weten wat interessante blogs, sites of fora zijn. Of welke Internethandels regelmatig met prijzen stunten. En wat de invoed van Internet op de wijnwereld is. Als ik Perswijn lees lijkt het alsof Internet niet bestaat.

    Proeverijen en proefclubs krijgen bijna geen aandacht (och ja, de Nieuwe Wereld, maar dat wordt dan ook door Perswijn zelf georganiseerd).

    Wijnreizen of bezoeken aan de wijnboer krijgen geen aandacht (terwijl de helft van mijn kelder gevuld is met eigen import). Perswijn legt zelf wel bezoeken af aan individuele producenten maar geeft de lezer geen beeld over welke gebieden interessant zijn als vakantiebestemming qua bezoek-, proef- en koopmogelijkheden.

    Ik heb het idee dat de artikelen niet zozeer gericht zijn op wat de lezers interessant vinden maar op wat de adverteerders niet bedreigend vinden. En dan loop je het risico dat je lezers afhaken. Wat mij betreft zou Perswijn een keuze moeten maken tussen advertentiemedium of opinieblad. Het is nu vlees noch vis en dat kan nooit lang goed gaan.

    Jasper

  • André

    Jan en zeker Jasper,

    Bedankt voor de opbouwende kritiek. Beide met een heel andere insteek en aangedragen oplossingen.

    Jullie weten dat ook Perswijn op het PB komt.

    Ik weet dat de redactie, waar ik geen deel van uitmaak, graag reacties van lezers krijgt!

    André

  • Willem Booij

    Beste Andre,

    de “lastigste” criticasters zijn vaak de mensen welke een laatste kreet laten horen over hun ontevredenheid. Deze signalen negeren om als minder belangrijk kenmerken zijn onverstandig.

    Juist dit soort geluiden zijn belangrijk om mee te nemen in een blik gericht op de toekomst.

    Perswijn zal overleven als het zoals Ralph opmerkt (en ook Jasper) het de trends in Media en Communicatie volgt en zichzelf eigen maakt.

    Gr

    ******

  • André

    Beste Willem,

    Helemaal eens! Zie mijn mail hierboven.

    Negeren gebeurt zeker niet, Wat brengt jou op die gedachte?

    Ik dacht eerst dat je mijn posting niet gelezen had maar dat kan natuurlijk niet.

    Ik begrijp je opmerking niet….

    Diepgang (Jan) en ontwikkelingen buiten het product (Pierre, Ralph) moeten juist de pijlers zijn. Dat kan een redactie ook niet negeren.

    Jullie opmerkingen zijn en blijven welkom, soms duurt het even, soms zullen ze niet opgevolgd worden. Maar zoals ik al zei : ze worden opgemerkt en zeker niet genegeerd

    Ik hoop dat je dit bericht goed leest. Anders wordt het te ingewikkeld voor mij.

    André

  • Hendrik

    Lees al jaren geen vaderlandse wijnbladen meer.

    Echter als geschenk ontvangen het december nummer (?) met de Sherry bijlage.

    Dat zat toch wel zo sterk in elkaar dat ik onmiddellijk wat flessen Sherry heb gekocht!

    Dan doe je het m.i. toch aardig goed :+

    Hendrik